Stop losing new clients
to unanswered messages.

It answers the questions that interrupt your day — practice areas, fees, what to bring to a consultation — from your website, PDFs, and fee sheet. It collects intake details (name, phone, matter type, timeline), shares your consultation link, and emails your team a clean summary. Anything that needs judgment routes to an attorney.

It's configured not to. The AI explains your practice areas, attorney experience, fee structure, and consultation process, then routes the matter to an attorney. It will not opine on case strategy, statute interpretation, likelihood of success, or specific legal recommendations — and tells the prospect so explicitly when asked. This is the right boundary: prospects get fast answers about working with you, and substantive counsel happens with a licensed attorney where it belongs.

Practice-area-specific intake. The AI asks the questions that actually matter for each matter type: for PI — date of incident, type of injury, was there a police report, current treatment status, prior counsel; for corporate — deal size, target close date, counterparty, jurisdiction, conflicts check needed. By the time your intake team picks up the lead, it's already sorted into "consult this week," "needs conflict check first," or "decline / refer out."

The AI is configured to collect what's needed for intake (name, contact, matter type, urgency, conflicts info) and explicitly avoid pressing for sensitive case detail in the chat — it tells the prospect their attorney will cover specifics under privilege at the consultation. Conversation transcripts are encrypted at rest, never used for model training, and accessible only to your team via your Hyperleap workspace.

For first-touch qualification and sharing your consultation link, yes — and you're not paying per-minute for a human answering service to take a message. For live screening that needs nuanced judgment or court-deadline emergencies, a hybrid setup (AI for the routine questions, a human service for the complex ones) often makes sense. We don't pretend to replace human judgment for high-stakes intake.